extramuralise: (enemies to enemies slow burn 500K)
✟ πŸΉπšπ™³ π™»πšƒ. 𝙹𝙾𝙷𝙽 π™Έπšπš…π™Έπ™½π™Ά ([personal profile] extramuralise) wrote in [community profile] duplicitymemes 2022-01-15 11:47 am (UTC)

[ Unfortunately, it does make sense enough to Irving that there would be a difference; even between a man and a woman there are manners in which to copulate, certain acts, which are considered either more sinful or less, with precious little of it being not at all sinful whatsoever. If Irving had more interest in women, even he might find it all a bit exhausting.

As for sodomy, though, there isn't exactly an equivalent scriptural breakdown as to the particular sinfulness levels of each particular act, so on that matter, he begrudgingly defers to Hickey's authority.

(Before he gives an answer, because he's still not a total fool.)
]

This difference being what, exactly?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting